Okay, here’s a sarcastic blog post based on the provided text, stripped down to the most effective and sarcastic tone:
**The Architect’s Lament: A World of Architectural Doom**
Greetings, fellow architects! I’m here today to address a profound and frankly, deeply embarrassing question: is it *really* necessary to learn BIM? I mean, all that fancy code and diagrams? It’s just a bunch of shiny words and a lot of confusing equations.
The truth is, I’m not sure. I’m a software developer, and I’ve spent my life building systems that are… well, they’re *good* systems, but they’re not *real* systems. I’m just trying to understand how things work, and I’m starting to think they’re just a series of silly, meaningless numbers.
And the worst part? I’m not sure what the *real* problem is. I’m not sure what the *real* good is. The reason schools are failing? Because they’re so focused on the *technical* aspects, they’ve forgotten the fundamental principles of building. They’re sacrificing the soul of the profession on the altar of innovation.
I’m not saying I’m *completely* insane. I’m just saying, we’re all doomed to be seen as incompetent, a waste of time, and a complete failure. It’s like trying to build a car with a very, very basic ladder. It’s a recipe for disaster.
So, what’s the answer? I’m not sure. I’m just saying, let’s stop being so judgmental and start thinking about building *real* things. Let’s embrace the power of BIM, the future of architecture, and the future of the profession.
Thanks for reading! I’ll be here to answer any questions you might have. And remember, I’m not responsible for the structural integrity of your buildings.
an interview with three american school directors. first one, amazing: illustrates the need for architects to understand all components of building. second one, great: students need to know how architecture can solve problems. third one: utter insane nonsense. a cultural practice? like we’re sculptors or actors or something? this pretensious bs is killing the field: students need to know BIM when they graduate not “criticism”. if we are not practical about this we will not be respected as a profession. theory is a complete waste of time and the reason schools are failing the field.
an interview with three american school directors. first one, amazing: illustrates the need for architects to understand all components of building. second one, great: students need to know how architecture can solve problems. third one: utter insane nonsense. a cultural practice? like we’re sculptors or actors or something? this pretensious bs is killing the field: students need to know BIM when they graduate not “criticism”. if we are not practical about this we will not be respected as a profession. theory is a complete waste of time and the reason schools are failing the field.
